The TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY driving irons offer golfers a unique option for longer iron play, blending advanced technology with versatility.
Having always preferred hybrids over long irons, I was skeptical about how these driving irons would perform. After testing them on the course and analysing the data, I think I may have been wrong!
WATCH THE FULL VIDEO…
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Review
The Tech
The P-UDI is a classic, thin driving iron designed for a penetrating, lower ball flight. The P-DHY, on the other hand, features a more substantial back, providing a look closer to a hybrid and promising extra forgiveness.
Both clubs incorporate familiar TaylorMade technologies like SpeedFoam Air and the Through-Slot Speed Pocket, along with tungsten weighting (up to 26 grams).
While both irons share similarities, the biggest difference lies in the CG (center of gravity) placement: the P-DHY has a lower CG, helping golfers launch the ball higher, whereas the P-UDI offers more of a mid-CG for a flatter, more piercing trajectory.
On-Course Performance
Testing both irons on the 17th tee at Stockport Golf Club, I encountered a tight, dangerous hole�an ideal scenario for these driving irons. I started with the thinner P-UDI, which offered a less forgiving look at address. Surprisingly, I was able to hit a clean, accurate shot down the fairway.
Next, I tried the P-DHY. With its hybrid-like profile, I felt more confident standing over the ball, and it delivered a similarly straight, easy-to-control shot. Both irons kept me in play off the tee, with the P-DHY landing further down the middle, thanks to its increased forgiveness.
As I continued testing, including on a tricky par-4 with a dogleg left, I found both clubs ideal for shots requiring around 190 yards of carry.
The DHY�s larger head gave me the confidence to swing with more power, and its higher launch angle provided the kind of forgiveness you expect from a hybrid.
The Data
After gathering data using Foresight technology, I found that the distances between the two clubs were nearly identical, with only a one-yard difference (the P-UDI edged out slightly in distance).
Ball speed was virtually the same for both irons, differing by just 0.1 mph. Spin rates also remained close, with the P-DHY producing slightly more spin. The DHY did have a marginally higher peak height and launch angle, which was expected due to its design.
Which Utility Iron Is Best for You?
Despite being a hybrid player, I found myself preferring the P-UDI for its clean feel at impact. When struck well, it delivered a crisp, satisfying shot, while the P-DHY provided a more consistent, forgiving performance.
The P-DHY was easier to hit and kept my shots straight down the middle more reliably. However, if you’re looking for a driving iron with a lower, more penetrating ball flight�especially for links-style golf�the P-UDI is the better option.
That said, both irons exceeded my expectations. If you�ve convinced yourself that you can’t hit long irons and need a hybrid, these driving irons are worth trying. The P-UDI provides surprising forgiveness for its size, while the P-DHY delivers consistent, easy-to-hit shots.
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Verdict
The TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY driving irons are fantastic options for golfers looking to add distance and precision without sacrificing forgiveness. Whether you’re a fan of long irons or a hybrid user like me, these clubs offer impressive performance, combining advanced technology with shot versatility.
I highly recommend giving both a try�especially if you�re considering adding a driving iron to your bag. You might just be as pleasantly surprised as I was.
TaylorMade P-UDI and P-DHY Utilities Pros and Cons
If you enjoyed this, you may also like:
